1275793eaSopenharmony_ci 2275793eaSopenharmony_ci Frequently Asked Questions about zlib 3275793eaSopenharmony_ci 4275793eaSopenharmony_ci 5275793eaSopenharmony_ciIf your question is not there, please check the zlib home page 6275793eaSopenharmony_cihttp://zlib.net/ which may have more recent information. 7275793eaSopenharmony_ciThe latest zlib FAQ is at http://zlib.net/zlib_faq.html 8275793eaSopenharmony_ci 9275793eaSopenharmony_ci 10275793eaSopenharmony_ci 1. Is zlib Y2K-compliant? 11275793eaSopenharmony_ci 12275793eaSopenharmony_ci Yes. zlib doesn't handle dates. 13275793eaSopenharmony_ci 14275793eaSopenharmony_ci 2. Where can I get a Windows DLL version? 15275793eaSopenharmony_ci 16275793eaSopenharmony_ci The zlib sources can be compiled without change to produce a DLL. See the 17275793eaSopenharmony_ci file win32/DLL_FAQ.txt in the zlib distribution. 18275793eaSopenharmony_ci 19275793eaSopenharmony_ci 3. Where can I get a Visual Basic interface to zlib? 20275793eaSopenharmony_ci 21275793eaSopenharmony_ci See 22275793eaSopenharmony_ci * http://marknelson.us/1997/01/01/zlib-engine/ 23275793eaSopenharmony_ci * win32/DLL_FAQ.txt in the zlib distribution 24275793eaSopenharmony_ci 25275793eaSopenharmony_ci 4. compress() returns Z_BUF_ERROR. 26275793eaSopenharmony_ci 27275793eaSopenharmony_ci Make sure that before the call of compress(), the length of the compressed 28275793eaSopenharmony_ci buffer is equal to the available size of the compressed buffer and not 29275793eaSopenharmony_ci zero. For Visual Basic, check that this parameter is passed by reference 30275793eaSopenharmony_ci ("as any"), not by value ("as long"). 31275793eaSopenharmony_ci 32275793eaSopenharmony_ci 5. deflate() or inflate() returns Z_BUF_ERROR. 33275793eaSopenharmony_ci 34275793eaSopenharmony_ci Before making the call, make sure that avail_in and avail_out are not zero. 35275793eaSopenharmony_ci When setting the parameter flush equal to Z_FINISH, also make sure that 36275793eaSopenharmony_ci avail_out is big enough to allow processing all pending input. Note that a 37275793eaSopenharmony_ci Z_BUF_ERROR is not fatal--another call to deflate() or inflate() can be 38275793eaSopenharmony_ci made with more input or output space. A Z_BUF_ERROR may in fact be 39275793eaSopenharmony_ci unavoidable depending on how the functions are used, since it is not 40275793eaSopenharmony_ci possible to tell whether or not there is more output pending when 41275793eaSopenharmony_ci strm.avail_out returns with zero. See http://zlib.net/zlib_how.html for a 42275793eaSopenharmony_ci heavily annotated example. 43275793eaSopenharmony_ci 44275793eaSopenharmony_ci 6. Where's the zlib documentation (man pages, etc.)? 45275793eaSopenharmony_ci 46275793eaSopenharmony_ci It's in zlib.h . Examples of zlib usage are in the files test/example.c 47275793eaSopenharmony_ci and test/minigzip.c, with more in examples/ . 48275793eaSopenharmony_ci 49275793eaSopenharmony_ci 7. Why don't you use GNU autoconf or libtool or ...? 50275793eaSopenharmony_ci 51275793eaSopenharmony_ci Because we would like to keep zlib as a very small and simple package. 52275793eaSopenharmony_ci zlib is rather portable and doesn't need much configuration. 53275793eaSopenharmony_ci 54275793eaSopenharmony_ci 8. I found a bug in zlib. 55275793eaSopenharmony_ci 56275793eaSopenharmony_ci Most of the time, such problems are due to an incorrect usage of zlib. 57275793eaSopenharmony_ci Please try to reproduce the problem with a small program and send the 58275793eaSopenharmony_ci corresponding source to us at zlib@gzip.org . Do not send multi-megabyte 59275793eaSopenharmony_ci data files without prior agreement. 60275793eaSopenharmony_ci 61275793eaSopenharmony_ci 9. Why do I get "undefined reference to gzputc"? 62275793eaSopenharmony_ci 63275793eaSopenharmony_ci If "make test" produces something like 64275793eaSopenharmony_ci 65275793eaSopenharmony_ci example.o(.text+0x154): undefined reference to `gzputc' 66275793eaSopenharmony_ci 67275793eaSopenharmony_ci check that you don't have old files libz.* in /usr/lib, /usr/local/lib or 68275793eaSopenharmony_ci /usr/X11R6/lib. Remove any old versions, then do "make install". 69275793eaSopenharmony_ci 70275793eaSopenharmony_ci10. I need a Delphi interface to zlib. 71275793eaSopenharmony_ci 72275793eaSopenharmony_ci See the contrib/delphi directory in the zlib distribution. 73275793eaSopenharmony_ci 74275793eaSopenharmony_ci11. Can zlib handle .zip archives? 75275793eaSopenharmony_ci 76275793eaSopenharmony_ci Not by itself, no. See the directory contrib/minizip in the zlib 77275793eaSopenharmony_ci distribution. 78275793eaSopenharmony_ci 79275793eaSopenharmony_ci12. Can zlib handle .Z files? 80275793eaSopenharmony_ci 81275793eaSopenharmony_ci No, sorry. You have to spawn an uncompress or gunzip subprocess, or adapt 82275793eaSopenharmony_ci the code of uncompress on your own. 83275793eaSopenharmony_ci 84275793eaSopenharmony_ci13. How can I make a Unix shared library? 85275793eaSopenharmony_ci 86275793eaSopenharmony_ci By default a shared (and a static) library is built for Unix. So: 87275793eaSopenharmony_ci 88275793eaSopenharmony_ci make distclean 89275793eaSopenharmony_ci ./configure 90275793eaSopenharmony_ci make 91275793eaSopenharmony_ci 92275793eaSopenharmony_ci14. How do I install a shared zlib library on Unix? 93275793eaSopenharmony_ci 94275793eaSopenharmony_ci After the above, then: 95275793eaSopenharmony_ci 96275793eaSopenharmony_ci make install 97275793eaSopenharmony_ci 98275793eaSopenharmony_ci However, many flavors of Unix come with a shared zlib already installed. 99275793eaSopenharmony_ci Before going to the trouble of compiling a shared version of zlib and 100275793eaSopenharmony_ci trying to install it, you may want to check if it's already there! If you 101275793eaSopenharmony_ci can #include <zlib.h>, it's there. The -lz option will probably link to 102275793eaSopenharmony_ci it. You can check the version at the top of zlib.h or with the 103275793eaSopenharmony_ci ZLIB_VERSION symbol defined in zlib.h . 104275793eaSopenharmony_ci 105275793eaSopenharmony_ci15. I have a question about OttoPDF. 106275793eaSopenharmony_ci 107275793eaSopenharmony_ci We are not the authors of OttoPDF. The real author is on the OttoPDF web 108275793eaSopenharmony_ci site: Joel Hainley, jhainley@myndkryme.com. 109275793eaSopenharmony_ci 110275793eaSopenharmony_ci16. Can zlib decode Flate data in an Adobe PDF file? 111275793eaSopenharmony_ci 112275793eaSopenharmony_ci Yes. See http://www.pdflib.com/ . To modify PDF forms, see 113275793eaSopenharmony_ci http://sourceforge.net/projects/acroformtool/ . 114275793eaSopenharmony_ci 115275793eaSopenharmony_ci17. Why am I getting this "register_frame_info not found" error on Solaris? 116275793eaSopenharmony_ci 117275793eaSopenharmony_ci After installing zlib 1.1.4 on Solaris 2.6, running applications using zlib 118275793eaSopenharmony_ci generates an error such as: 119275793eaSopenharmony_ci 120275793eaSopenharmony_ci ld.so.1: rpm: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/local/lib/libz.so: 121275793eaSopenharmony_ci symbol __register_frame_info: referenced symbol not found 122275793eaSopenharmony_ci 123275793eaSopenharmony_ci The symbol __register_frame_info is not part of zlib, it is generated by 124275793eaSopenharmony_ci the C compiler (cc or gcc). You must recompile applications using zlib 125275793eaSopenharmony_ci which have this problem. This problem is specific to Solaris. See 126275793eaSopenharmony_ci http://www.sunfreeware.com for Solaris versions of zlib and applications 127275793eaSopenharmony_ci using zlib. 128275793eaSopenharmony_ci 129275793eaSopenharmony_ci18. Why does gzip give an error on a file I make with compress/deflate? 130275793eaSopenharmony_ci 131275793eaSopenharmony_ci The compress and deflate functions produce data in the zlib format, which 132275793eaSopenharmony_ci is different and incompatible with the gzip format. The gz* functions in 133275793eaSopenharmony_ci zlib on the other hand use the gzip format. Both the zlib and gzip formats 134275793eaSopenharmony_ci use the same compressed data format internally, but have different headers 135275793eaSopenharmony_ci and trailers around the compressed data. 136275793eaSopenharmony_ci 137275793eaSopenharmony_ci19. Ok, so why are there two different formats? 138275793eaSopenharmony_ci 139275793eaSopenharmony_ci The gzip format was designed to retain the directory information about a 140275793eaSopenharmony_ci single file, such as the name and last modification date. The zlib format 141275793eaSopenharmony_ci on the other hand was designed for in-memory and communication channel 142275793eaSopenharmony_ci applications, and has a much more compact header and trailer and uses a 143275793eaSopenharmony_ci faster integrity check than gzip. 144275793eaSopenharmony_ci 145275793eaSopenharmony_ci20. Well that's nice, but how do I make a gzip file in memory? 146275793eaSopenharmony_ci 147275793eaSopenharmony_ci You can request that deflate write the gzip format instead of the zlib 148275793eaSopenharmony_ci format using deflateInit2(). You can also request that inflate decode the 149275793eaSopenharmony_ci gzip format using inflateInit2(). Read zlib.h for more details. 150275793eaSopenharmony_ci 151275793eaSopenharmony_ci21. Is zlib thread-safe? 152275793eaSopenharmony_ci 153275793eaSopenharmony_ci Yes. However any library routines that zlib uses and any application- 154275793eaSopenharmony_ci provided memory allocation routines must also be thread-safe. zlib's gz* 155275793eaSopenharmony_ci functions use stdio library routines, and most of zlib's functions use the 156275793eaSopenharmony_ci library memory allocation routines by default. zlib's *Init* functions 157275793eaSopenharmony_ci allow for the application to provide custom memory allocation routines. 158275793eaSopenharmony_ci 159275793eaSopenharmony_ci Of course, you should only operate on any given zlib or gzip stream from a 160275793eaSopenharmony_ci single thread at a time. 161275793eaSopenharmony_ci 162275793eaSopenharmony_ci22. Can I use zlib in my commercial application? 163275793eaSopenharmony_ci 164275793eaSopenharmony_ci Yes. Please read the license in zlib.h. 165275793eaSopenharmony_ci 166275793eaSopenharmony_ci23. Is zlib under the GNU license? 167275793eaSopenharmony_ci 168275793eaSopenharmony_ci No. Please read the license in zlib.h. 169275793eaSopenharmony_ci 170275793eaSopenharmony_ci24. The license says that altered source versions must be "plainly marked". So 171275793eaSopenharmony_ci what exactly do I need to do to meet that requirement? 172275793eaSopenharmony_ci 173275793eaSopenharmony_ci You need to change the ZLIB_VERSION and ZLIB_VERNUM #defines in zlib.h. In 174275793eaSopenharmony_ci particular, the final version number needs to be changed to "f", and an 175275793eaSopenharmony_ci identification string should be appended to ZLIB_VERSION. Version numbers 176275793eaSopenharmony_ci x.x.x.f are reserved for modifications to zlib by others than the zlib 177275793eaSopenharmony_ci maintainers. For example, if the version of the base zlib you are altering 178275793eaSopenharmony_ci is "1.2.3.4", then in zlib.h you should change ZLIB_VERNUM to 0x123f, and 179275793eaSopenharmony_ci ZLIB_VERSION to something like "1.2.3.f-zachary-mods-v3". You can also 180275793eaSopenharmony_ci update the version strings in deflate.c and inftrees.c. 181275793eaSopenharmony_ci 182275793eaSopenharmony_ci For altered source distributions, you should also note the origin and 183275793eaSopenharmony_ci nature of the changes in zlib.h, as well as in ChangeLog and README, along 184275793eaSopenharmony_ci with the dates of the alterations. The origin should include at least your 185275793eaSopenharmony_ci name (or your company's name), and an email address to contact for help or 186275793eaSopenharmony_ci issues with the library. 187275793eaSopenharmony_ci 188275793eaSopenharmony_ci Note that distributing a compiled zlib library along with zlib.h and 189275793eaSopenharmony_ci zconf.h is also a source distribution, and so you should change 190275793eaSopenharmony_ci ZLIB_VERSION and ZLIB_VERNUM and note the origin and nature of the changes 191275793eaSopenharmony_ci in zlib.h as you would for a full source distribution. 192275793eaSopenharmony_ci 193275793eaSopenharmony_ci25. Will zlib work on a big-endian or little-endian architecture, and can I 194275793eaSopenharmony_ci exchange compressed data between them? 195275793eaSopenharmony_ci 196275793eaSopenharmony_ci Yes and yes. 197275793eaSopenharmony_ci 198275793eaSopenharmony_ci26. Will zlib work on a 64-bit machine? 199275793eaSopenharmony_ci 200275793eaSopenharmony_ci Yes. It has been tested on 64-bit machines, and has no dependence on any 201275793eaSopenharmony_ci data types being limited to 32-bits in length. If you have any 202275793eaSopenharmony_ci difficulties, please provide a complete problem report to zlib@gzip.org 203275793eaSopenharmony_ci 204275793eaSopenharmony_ci27. Will zlib decompress data from the PKWare Data Compression Library? 205275793eaSopenharmony_ci 206275793eaSopenharmony_ci No. The PKWare DCL uses a completely different compressed data format than 207275793eaSopenharmony_ci does PKZIP and zlib. However, you can look in zlib's contrib/blast 208275793eaSopenharmony_ci directory for a possible solution to your problem. 209275793eaSopenharmony_ci 210275793eaSopenharmony_ci28. Can I access data randomly in a compressed stream? 211275793eaSopenharmony_ci 212275793eaSopenharmony_ci No, not without some preparation. If when compressing you periodically use 213275793eaSopenharmony_ci Z_FULL_FLUSH, carefully write all the pending data at those points, and 214275793eaSopenharmony_ci keep an index of those locations, then you can start decompression at those 215275793eaSopenharmony_ci points. You have to be careful to not use Z_FULL_FLUSH too often, since it 216275793eaSopenharmony_ci can significantly degrade compression. Alternatively, you can scan a 217275793eaSopenharmony_ci deflate stream once to generate an index, and then use that index for 218275793eaSopenharmony_ci random access. See examples/zran.c . 219275793eaSopenharmony_ci 220275793eaSopenharmony_ci29. Does zlib work on MVS, OS/390, CICS, etc.? 221275793eaSopenharmony_ci 222275793eaSopenharmony_ci It has in the past, but we have not heard of any recent evidence. There 223275793eaSopenharmony_ci were working ports of zlib 1.1.4 to MVS, but those links no longer work. 224275793eaSopenharmony_ci If you know of recent, successful applications of zlib on these operating 225275793eaSopenharmony_ci systems, please let us know. Thanks. 226275793eaSopenharmony_ci 227275793eaSopenharmony_ci30. Is there some simpler, easier to read version of inflate I can look at to 228275793eaSopenharmony_ci understand the deflate format? 229275793eaSopenharmony_ci 230275793eaSopenharmony_ci First off, you should read RFC 1951. Second, yes. Look in zlib's 231275793eaSopenharmony_ci contrib/puff directory. 232275793eaSopenharmony_ci 233275793eaSopenharmony_ci31. Does zlib infringe on any patents? 234275793eaSopenharmony_ci 235275793eaSopenharmony_ci As far as we know, no. In fact, that was originally the whole point behind 236275793eaSopenharmony_ci zlib. Look here for some more information: 237275793eaSopenharmony_ci 238275793eaSopenharmony_ci http://www.gzip.org/#faq11 239275793eaSopenharmony_ci 240275793eaSopenharmony_ci32. Can zlib work with greater than 4 GB of data? 241275793eaSopenharmony_ci 242275793eaSopenharmony_ci Yes. inflate() and deflate() will process any amount of data correctly. 243275793eaSopenharmony_ci Each call of inflate() or deflate() is limited to input and output chunks 244275793eaSopenharmony_ci of the maximum value that can be stored in the compiler's "unsigned int" 245275793eaSopenharmony_ci type, but there is no limit to the number of chunks. Note however that the 246275793eaSopenharmony_ci strm.total_in and strm_total_out counters may be limited to 4 GB. These 247275793eaSopenharmony_ci counters are provided as a convenience and are not used internally by 248275793eaSopenharmony_ci inflate() or deflate(). The application can easily set up its own counters 249275793eaSopenharmony_ci updated after each call of inflate() or deflate() to count beyond 4 GB. 250275793eaSopenharmony_ci compress() and uncompress() may be limited to 4 GB, since they operate in a 251275793eaSopenharmony_ci single call. gzseek() and gztell() may be limited to 4 GB depending on how 252275793eaSopenharmony_ci zlib is compiled. See the zlibCompileFlags() function in zlib.h. 253275793eaSopenharmony_ci 254275793eaSopenharmony_ci The word "may" appears several times above since there is a 4 GB limit only 255275793eaSopenharmony_ci if the compiler's "long" type is 32 bits. If the compiler's "long" type is 256275793eaSopenharmony_ci 64 bits, then the limit is 16 exabytes. 257275793eaSopenharmony_ci 258275793eaSopenharmony_ci33. Does zlib have any security vulnerabilities? 259275793eaSopenharmony_ci 260275793eaSopenharmony_ci The only one that we are aware of is potentially in gzprintf(). If zlib is 261275793eaSopenharmony_ci compiled to use sprintf() or vsprintf(), then there is no protection 262275793eaSopenharmony_ci against a buffer overflow of an 8K string space (or other value as set by 263275793eaSopenharmony_ci gzbuffer()), other than the caller of gzprintf() assuring that the output 264275793eaSopenharmony_ci will not exceed 8K. On the other hand, if zlib is compiled to use 265275793eaSopenharmony_ci snprintf() or vsnprintf(), which should normally be the case, then there is 266275793eaSopenharmony_ci no vulnerability. The ./configure script will display warnings if an 267275793eaSopenharmony_ci insecure variation of sprintf() will be used by gzprintf(). Also the 268275793eaSopenharmony_ci zlibCompileFlags() function will return information on what variant of 269275793eaSopenharmony_ci sprintf() is used by gzprintf(). 270275793eaSopenharmony_ci 271275793eaSopenharmony_ci If you don't have snprintf() or vsnprintf() and would like one, you can 272275793eaSopenharmony_ci find a portable implementation here: 273275793eaSopenharmony_ci 274275793eaSopenharmony_ci http://www.ijs.si/software/snprintf/ 275275793eaSopenharmony_ci 276275793eaSopenharmony_ci Note that you should be using the most recent version of zlib. Versions 277275793eaSopenharmony_ci 1.1.3 and before were subject to a double-free vulnerability, and versions 278275793eaSopenharmony_ci 1.2.1 and 1.2.2 were subject to an access exception when decompressing 279275793eaSopenharmony_ci invalid compressed data. 280275793eaSopenharmony_ci 281275793eaSopenharmony_ci34. Is there a Java version of zlib? 282275793eaSopenharmony_ci 283275793eaSopenharmony_ci Probably what you want is to use zlib in Java. zlib is already included 284275793eaSopenharmony_ci as part of the Java SDK in the java.util.zip package. If you really want 285275793eaSopenharmony_ci a version of zlib written in the Java language, look on the zlib home 286275793eaSopenharmony_ci page for links: http://zlib.net/ . 287275793eaSopenharmony_ci 288275793eaSopenharmony_ci35. I get this or that compiler or source-code scanner warning when I crank it 289275793eaSopenharmony_ci up to maximally-pedantic. Can't you guys write proper code? 290275793eaSopenharmony_ci 291275793eaSopenharmony_ci Many years ago, we gave up attempting to avoid warnings on every compiler 292275793eaSopenharmony_ci in the universe. It just got to be a waste of time, and some compilers 293275793eaSopenharmony_ci were downright silly as well as contradicted each other. So now, we simply 294275793eaSopenharmony_ci make sure that the code always works. 295275793eaSopenharmony_ci 296275793eaSopenharmony_ci36. Valgrind (or some similar memory access checker) says that deflate is 297275793eaSopenharmony_ci performing a conditional jump that depends on an uninitialized value. 298275793eaSopenharmony_ci Isn't that a bug? 299275793eaSopenharmony_ci 300275793eaSopenharmony_ci No. That is intentional for performance reasons, and the output of deflate 301275793eaSopenharmony_ci is not affected. This only started showing up recently since zlib 1.2.x 302275793eaSopenharmony_ci uses malloc() by default for allocations, whereas earlier versions used 303275793eaSopenharmony_ci calloc(), which zeros out the allocated memory. Even though the code was 304275793eaSopenharmony_ci correct, versions 1.2.4 and later was changed to not stimulate these 305275793eaSopenharmony_ci checkers. 306275793eaSopenharmony_ci 307275793eaSopenharmony_ci37. Will zlib read the (insert any ancient or arcane format here) compressed 308275793eaSopenharmony_ci data format? 309275793eaSopenharmony_ci 310275793eaSopenharmony_ci Probably not. Look in the comp.compression FAQ for pointers to various 311275793eaSopenharmony_ci formats and associated software. 312275793eaSopenharmony_ci 313275793eaSopenharmony_ci38. How can I encrypt/decrypt zip files with zlib? 314275793eaSopenharmony_ci 315275793eaSopenharmony_ci zlib doesn't support encryption. The original PKZIP encryption is very 316275793eaSopenharmony_ci weak and can be broken with freely available programs. To get strong 317275793eaSopenharmony_ci encryption, use GnuPG, http://www.gnupg.org/ , which already includes zlib 318275793eaSopenharmony_ci compression. For PKZIP compatible "encryption", look at 319275793eaSopenharmony_ci http://www.info-zip.org/ 320275793eaSopenharmony_ci 321275793eaSopenharmony_ci39. What's the difference between the "gzip" and "deflate" HTTP 1.1 encodings? 322275793eaSopenharmony_ci 323275793eaSopenharmony_ci "gzip" is the gzip format, and "deflate" is the zlib format. They should 324275793eaSopenharmony_ci probably have called the second one "zlib" instead to avoid confusion with 325275793eaSopenharmony_ci the raw deflate compressed data format. While the HTTP 1.1 RFC 2616 326275793eaSopenharmony_ci correctly points to the zlib specification in RFC 1950 for the "deflate" 327275793eaSopenharmony_ci transfer encoding, there have been reports of servers and browsers that 328275793eaSopenharmony_ci incorrectly produce or expect raw deflate data per the deflate 329275793eaSopenharmony_ci specification in RFC 1951, most notably Microsoft. So even though the 330275793eaSopenharmony_ci "deflate" transfer encoding using the zlib format would be the more 331275793eaSopenharmony_ci efficient approach (and in fact exactly what the zlib format was designed 332275793eaSopenharmony_ci for), using the "gzip" transfer encoding is probably more reliable due to 333275793eaSopenharmony_ci an unfortunate choice of name on the part of the HTTP 1.1 authors. 334275793eaSopenharmony_ci 335275793eaSopenharmony_ci Bottom line: use the gzip format for HTTP 1.1 encoding. 336275793eaSopenharmony_ci 337275793eaSopenharmony_ci40. Does zlib support the new "Deflate64" format introduced by PKWare? 338275793eaSopenharmony_ci 339275793eaSopenharmony_ci No. PKWare has apparently decided to keep that format proprietary, since 340275793eaSopenharmony_ci they have not documented it as they have previous compression formats. In 341275793eaSopenharmony_ci any case, the compression improvements are so modest compared to other more 342275793eaSopenharmony_ci modern approaches, that it's not worth the effort to implement. 343275793eaSopenharmony_ci 344275793eaSopenharmony_ci41. I'm having a problem with the zip functions in zlib, can you help? 345275793eaSopenharmony_ci 346275793eaSopenharmony_ci There are no zip functions in zlib. You are probably using minizip by 347275793eaSopenharmony_ci Giles Vollant, which is found in the contrib directory of zlib. It is not 348275793eaSopenharmony_ci part of zlib. In fact none of the stuff in contrib is part of zlib. The 349275793eaSopenharmony_ci files in there are not supported by the zlib authors. You need to contact 350275793eaSopenharmony_ci the authors of the respective contribution for help. 351275793eaSopenharmony_ci 352275793eaSopenharmony_ci42. The match.asm code in contrib is under the GNU General Public License. 353275793eaSopenharmony_ci Since it's part of zlib, doesn't that mean that all of zlib falls under the 354275793eaSopenharmony_ci GNU GPL? 355275793eaSopenharmony_ci 356275793eaSopenharmony_ci No. The files in contrib are not part of zlib. They were contributed by 357275793eaSopenharmony_ci other authors and are provided as a convenience to the user within the zlib 358275793eaSopenharmony_ci distribution. Each item in contrib has its own license. 359275793eaSopenharmony_ci 360275793eaSopenharmony_ci43. Is zlib subject to export controls? What is its ECCN? 361275793eaSopenharmony_ci 362275793eaSopenharmony_ci zlib is not subject to export controls, and so is classified as EAR99. 363275793eaSopenharmony_ci 364275793eaSopenharmony_ci44. Can you please sign these lengthy legal documents and fax them back to us 365275793eaSopenharmony_ci so that we can use your software in our product? 366275793eaSopenharmony_ci 367275793eaSopenharmony_ci No. Go away. Shoo. 368