162306a36Sopenharmony_ci=======================
262306a36Sopenharmony_ciIRQ-flags state tracing
362306a36Sopenharmony_ci=======================
462306a36Sopenharmony_ci
562306a36Sopenharmony_ci:Author: started by Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
662306a36Sopenharmony_ci
762306a36Sopenharmony_ciThe "irq-flags tracing" feature "traces" hardirq and softirq state, in
862306a36Sopenharmony_cithat it gives interested subsystems an opportunity to be notified of
962306a36Sopenharmony_cievery hardirqs-off/hardirqs-on, softirqs-off/softirqs-on event that
1062306a36Sopenharmony_cihappens in the kernel.
1162306a36Sopenharmony_ci
1262306a36Sopenharmony_ciCONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT is needed for CONFIG_PROVE_SPIN_LOCKING
1362306a36Sopenharmony_ciand CONFIG_PROVE_RW_LOCKING to be offered by the generic lock debugging
1462306a36Sopenharmony_cicode. Otherwise only CONFIG_PROVE_MUTEX_LOCKING and
1562306a36Sopenharmony_ciCONFIG_PROVE_RWSEM_LOCKING will be offered on an architecture - these
1662306a36Sopenharmony_ciare locking APIs that are not used in IRQ context. (the one exception
1762306a36Sopenharmony_cifor rwsems is worked around)
1862306a36Sopenharmony_ci
1962306a36Sopenharmony_ciArchitecture support for this is certainly not in the "trivial"
2062306a36Sopenharmony_cicategory, because lots of lowlevel assembly code deal with irq-flags
2162306a36Sopenharmony_cistate changes. But an architecture can be irq-flags-tracing enabled in a
2262306a36Sopenharmony_cirather straightforward and risk-free manner.
2362306a36Sopenharmony_ci
2462306a36Sopenharmony_ciArchitectures that want to support this need to do a couple of
2562306a36Sopenharmony_cicode-organizational changes first:
2662306a36Sopenharmony_ci
2762306a36Sopenharmony_ci- add and enable TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT in their arch level Kconfig file
2862306a36Sopenharmony_ci
2962306a36Sopenharmony_ciand then a couple of functional changes are needed as well to implement
3062306a36Sopenharmony_ciirq-flags-tracing support:
3162306a36Sopenharmony_ci
3262306a36Sopenharmony_ci- in lowlevel entry code add (build-conditional) calls to the
3362306a36Sopenharmony_ci  trace_hardirqs_off()/trace_hardirqs_on() functions. The lock validator
3462306a36Sopenharmony_ci  closely guards whether the 'real' irq-flags matches the 'virtual'
3562306a36Sopenharmony_ci  irq-flags state, and complains loudly (and turns itself off) if the
3662306a36Sopenharmony_ci  two do not match. Usually most of the time for arch support for
3762306a36Sopenharmony_ci  irq-flags-tracing is spent in this state: look at the lockdep
3862306a36Sopenharmony_ci  complaint, try to figure out the assembly code we did not cover yet,
3962306a36Sopenharmony_ci  fix and repeat. Once the system has booted up and works without a
4062306a36Sopenharmony_ci  lockdep complaint in the irq-flags-tracing functions arch support is
4162306a36Sopenharmony_ci  complete.
4262306a36Sopenharmony_ci- if the architecture has non-maskable interrupts then those need to be
4362306a36Sopenharmony_ci  excluded from the irq-tracing [and lock validation] mechanism via
4462306a36Sopenharmony_ci  lockdep_off()/lockdep_on().
4562306a36Sopenharmony_ci
4662306a36Sopenharmony_ciIn general there is no risk from having an incomplete irq-flags-tracing
4762306a36Sopenharmony_ciimplementation in an architecture: lockdep will detect that and will
4862306a36Sopenharmony_citurn itself off. I.e. the lock validator will still be reliable. There
4962306a36Sopenharmony_cishould be no crashes due to irq-tracing bugs. (except if the assembly
5062306a36Sopenharmony_cichanges break other code by modifying conditions or registers that
5162306a36Sopenharmony_cishouldn't be)
5262306a36Sopenharmony_ci
53