18c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ciC IRIW+fencembonceonces+OnceOnce
28c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci
38c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci(*
48c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci * Result: Never
58c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci *
68c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci * Test of independent reads from independent writes with smp_mb()
78c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci * between each pairs of reads.  In other words, is smp_mb() sufficient to
88c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci * cause two different reading processes to agree on the order of a pair
98c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci * of writes, where each write is to a different variable by a different
108c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci * process?  This litmus test exercises LKMM's "propagation" rule.
118c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci *)
128c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci
138c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci{}
148c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci
158c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ciP0(int *x)
168c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci{
178c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci	WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
188c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci}
198c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci
208c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ciP1(int *x, int *y)
218c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci{
228c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci	int r0;
238c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci	int r1;
248c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci
258c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci	r0 = READ_ONCE(*x);
268c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci	smp_mb();
278c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci	r1 = READ_ONCE(*y);
288c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci}
298c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci
308c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ciP2(int *y)
318c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci{
328c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci	WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
338c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci}
348c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci
358c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ciP3(int *x, int *y)
368c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci{
378c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci	int r0;
388c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci	int r1;
398c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci
408c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci	r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
418c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci	smp_mb();
428c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci	r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
438c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci}
448c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ci
458c2ecf20Sopenharmony_ciexists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0 /\ 3:r0=1 /\ 3:r1=0)
46